Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025

Received: 26 August 2025     Accepted: 18 September 2025     Published: 10 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Male infertility in Pakistan exhibits unique genetic patterns due to high consanguinity rates (65%). This systematic review of 38 studies (2015-2025) analyzed 2,041 participants (1,503 infertile men, 538 controls) using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Key findings reveal distinct genetic causes and inheritance patterns specific to this population. Chromosomal abnormalities affected 20.9% of azoospermic men, primarily Klinefelter syndrome (14.7%). Y-chromosome microdeletions occurred in 8% of cases, mostly in the AZFc region (50%). We identified 72 pathogenic variants across 58 genes, with 70.8% being novel to Pakistani populations. Consanguinity drove homozygous inheritance in 72.2% of cases. The most frequently mutated genes included ADAD2 (30% of non-obstructive azoospermia), HFM1 (20%), and DNAH family members (28.7% of motility defects). Variant types comprised frameshift (38.9%), missense (33.3%), nonsense (16.7%), and splicing mutations (11.1%). Significant biochemical markers included the CAT rs7943316 TT genotype (70.9% vs 14% controls) and elevated oxidative stress markers. These findings establish the first comprehensive genetic profile of Pakistani male infertility, demonstrating the profound impact of consanguinity on disease expression. The results emphasize the need for population-specific diagnostic protocols that prioritize DNAH/CFAP genes for motility disorders and ADAD2 for non-obstructive azoospermia. This review provides critical insights for genetic counseling and clinical management in high-consanguinity populations.

Published in International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 13, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11
Page(s) 73-82
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Consanguinity Male Infertility Pakistan, Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), Male Infertility, Consanguineous Marriages, Spermatogenic Failure, Y-chromosome Deletion

1. Introduction
Consanguineous marriages, defined as unions between biologically related individuals, represent a deeply rooted cultural practice affecting approximately 20% of the global population, particularly across South Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa . Pakistan exhibits one of the world's highest consanguinity rates (65%), with first-cousin marriages being most prevalent, followed by India (55%) and Saudi Arabia (50%) . While urbanization has gradually reduced this practice, sociocultural factors including religion, tradition, and economic considerations continue to sustain consanguinity across generations . This reproductive pattern significantly impacts population genetics, increasing homozygosity for autosomal recessive disorders and contributing to elevated rates of idiopathic male infertility - estimated to be 30-40% higher in consanguineous populations compared to Western countries .
Male infertility constitutes a major global health challenge, affecting 7-12% of men worldwide and contributing to nearly 50% of cases where couples fail to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse . The genetic etiology is complex, with chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., Klinefelter syndrome), Y-chromosome microdeletions, and single-gene defects collectively accounting for 15-20% of cases . Notably, spermatogenic failure remains unexplained in over 60% of azoospermic men, highlighting critical gaps in our understanding of testicular dysfunction . This knowledge deficit is particularly pronounced in high-consanguinity populations like Pakistan, where unique genetic architectures may underlie infertility phenotypes.
Investigating male infertility presents substantial challenges, including phenotypic heterogeneity, the polygenic nature of spermatogenesis (involving >4,000 genes), and confounding environmental factors . While next-generation sequencing has revolutionized gene discovery, studies frequently yield inconsistent results due to population stratification, small sample sizes, and variable phenotypic classifications. These limitations are especially relevant in Pakistan, where despite high infertility rates, systematic genetic studies remain scarce.
This review synthesizes a decade (2015-2025) of research on genetic causes of male infertility in Pakistan, with particular focus on whole exome sequencing findings from consanguineous families. By analyzing population-specific mutation spectra, inheritance patterns, and genotype-phenotype correlations, we aim to elucidate the unique genetic landscape of male infertility in Pakistan and identify priorities for future research and clinical translation in high-consanguinity settings.
2. Methodology
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Chart.
This systematic review was conducted to analyze genetic studies on infertility disorders in Pakistani families, covering both syndromic and non-syndromic cases reported between January 2015 and June 2025 according to PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were designed to incorporate literature that provided comprehensive genetic insights into male infertility, particularly focusing on mutations, whole exome sequencing findings, and the impact of consanguinity on infertility in the Pakistani population. To achieve this objective, an extensive literature search was performed using prominent academic databases, including Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed (NCBI). Relevant studies were identified using a combination of keywords such as "hereditary infertility disorders," "Pakistani mutations," "whole exome sequencing," "male infertility in Pakistan," "consanguinity and infertility in Pakistan," and related terms. The initial search results were systematically filtered to exclude irrelevant studies, ensuring that only articles directly pertinent to the genetic basis of infertility were retained. The initial search was conducted on January 4, 2025, and yielded 75 articles in total (Figure 1). Following the removal of 5 duplicates, two independent reviewers screened the remaining 70 articles against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved through discussion, leading to consensus. A total of 58 articles met the initial screening criteria and underwent further eligibility assessment. After excluding 18 articles that did not report the outcomes of interest, 40 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review.
3. Data Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion criteria for this systematic review were carefully defined to ensure the selection of relevant and high-quality studies. Studies were included if they met the following conditions: (1) a primary focus on consanguinity and the genetic basis of male infertility susceptibility; (2) case-control studies involving human participants, where cases consisted of infertile males with idiopathic infertility (encompassing subtypes such as Y-chromosome microdeletions, cytogenetic abnormalities, azoospermia, asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, and oligozoospermia) and controls were fertile males; (3) reporting of genotype or allele frequency data for both cases and controls; and (4) availability of complete full-text articles.
Conversely, studies were excluded based on the following criteria: (1) those investigating environmental factors rather than genetic causes of male infertility; (2) animal studies, review articles, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, and editorial papers; (3) duplicate publications; and (4) studies lacking relevant genetic or clinical data. These criteria ensured that only methodologically sound and directly applicable research was included in the analysis.
4. Data Extraction and Verification
A standardized approach was employed for data extraction to maintain consistency and accuracy. The following key details were retrieved from each selected study: (I) the first author’s name, (II) publication year, (III) geographical region and ethnicity of the study population, (IV) genotyping methodology, (V) sample sizes for both cases and controls, (VI) sources of control groups, and prevalence of genotypes and alleles.
To minimize bias, two independent authors performed the data extraction. Any discrepancies between the extracted data were resolved through discussion and, if necessary, adjudication by a third author. This rigorous verification process ensured the reliability and reproducibility of the collected data, reinforcing the validity of the subsequent meta-analysis. The extracted information was systematically organized to facilitate comparative analysis and synthesis of genetic findings across different studies.
5. Results
5.1. Chromosomal Analysis of Infertility Cases in Pakistani Population
One reported study analyzed chromosomal abnormalities in 241 individuals presenting with infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi Pakistan from 2017-2021. The cohort included 129 infertility cases (azoospermia/oligospermia) and 7 recurrent pregnancy loss cases. Using standard GTG-banding techniques, we detected chromosomal abnormalities in 18.3% of participants (44/241), with higher prevalence (20.6%, 28/136). Among infertility cases, abnormalities were found in 20.9% cases. while the pregnancy loss group showed abnormalities in only in one male (1.7) 14.3%. The most common numerical abnormalities were Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY) in males (14.7% of abnormal cases). Structural abnormalities (5.4% of total cases) included Robertsonian translocations, sex chromosome abnormalities, and heteromorphisms . The detailed distribution and types of chromosomal abnormalities observed are presented in the accompanying Table 1.
Table 1. Cytogenetic abnormalities in infertile men.

Category

Size (N=136)

Total abnormalities

28 (20.6%)

Infertility group

27/129 (20.9%)

Miscarriage group

1/7 (14.2%)

Numerical abnormalities

22 (16.2%)

Klinefelter (47, XXY)

20

Turner (45, X)

-

Structural Abnormalities

6 (4.4%)

Robertsonian translocation

1

Sex reversal (46, XX/46, XY)

1

Y-chromosome Microdeletions
The focal point of this review is the analysis of Yq microdeletions in male infertility cases in Pakistani population from 2015 to June 2025. Only one paper has been published in this duration and Yq microdeletions were detected in 12 (5.45%) of the cases, while none were found in the control group (p ≤ 0.007). All microdeletions were identified in azoospermic men, accounting for 12 out of 150 (8.0%) cases. Among patients with microdeletions, the distribution of affected AZF regions was as follows: AZFa in 1 (8.33%), AZFb in 2 (16.67%), AZFc in 6 (50%), AZFb+c in 2 (16.67%), and complete AZF deletions in 1 (8.33%) patient (Table 2).
Table 2. Distribution of Yq microdeletions in Azoospermia men.

Category

Number of cases (%)

Total cases with Yq microdeletions

12 (5.45%)

Microdeletions in azoospermia cases

12/150 (8%)

AZFa deletion

1 (8.33%)

AZFb deletion

2 (16.67%)

AZFc deletion

6 (50%)

AZFb+c deletion

2 (16.67%)

Complete AZF deletion

(8.33%)

5.2. Genetic Cause of Azoospermia in the Pakistani Population
5.2.1. Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)/Spermatogenic Failure
On average, men of reproductive age ejaculate approximately 96 million sperm per ejaculation . Azoospermia-the complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate-affects roughly 1% of all men and 10–15% of infertile males, regardless of the underlying cause . In about two-thirds of azoospermic men, the condition is linked to untreatable testicular disorders leading to spermatogenic failure. Also referred to as non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), SF represents the most severe form of male infertility .
Different pathogenic variants associated with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and obstructive azoospermia (OA) in Pakistani families are summarized in Table 3. Overall, ten disease-causing variants across nine genes (SPATA22, MEIOB, C14orf39/SIX6OS1, MSH5, HFM1, DND1, KCTD19, ADAD2, ZSWIM7, and YTHDC2) were identified in consanguineous Pakistani families with NOA (Table 3). Among these, ADAD2 was the most frequently mutated gene, found in three unrelated families (30%), followed by HFM1 (20%) and C14orf39/SIX6OS1 (10%). The remaining genes (SPATA22, MEIOB, MSH5, DND1, KCTD19, ZSWIM7, and YTHDC2) were each reported in a single family (10% each). All identified variants were homozygous, except for one case of compound heterozygous mutations in ADAD2. The mutations were categorized based on their type, including missense (50%), frameshift (30%), splicing (10%), and nonsense (10%) (Table 1). Functional studies revealed that these mutations disrupt critical meiotic processes, such as homologous chromosome synapsis (C14orf39/SIX6OS1, MSH5, ZSWIM7), protein-protein interactions (SPATA22-MEIOB, DND1), meiotic progression (HFM1, KCTD19, ADAD2), and RNA metabolism and translational regulation (YTHDC2).
5.2.2. Obstructive Azoospermia (OA)
One study has been reported to investigate the genetic basis of obstructive azoospermia (OA) in a non-consanguineous Pakistani family with three infertile males . Comprehensive clinical assessments, including semen analysis, hormonal profiling, testicular histology, ultrasonography, karyotyping, Y-chromosome microdeletion screening, and CFTR testing, confirmed the OA diagnosis. WES of two affected brothers and two fertile relatives identified a novel nonsense variant in the X-linked ADGRG2 gene (c.2440C>T, p.Arg814*), which was prioritized as the most biologically plausible candidate. This variant, absent in ExAC and gnomAD population databases, introduces a premature stop codon predicted to truncate 204 amino acids from the critical transmembrane domain.
Table 3. Genetic Cause of Azoospermia.

Category

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)

Obstructive Azoospermia (OA)

Key Genes

SPATA22, MEIOB, C14orf39, MSH5, HFM1, DND1, KCTD19, ADAD2, ZSWIM7, YTHDC2

ADGRG2

Frequent Mutations

ADAD2 (30%), HFM1 (20%), C14orf39 (10%)

ADGRG2 (100%)

Mutation Types

Missense (50%), Frameshift (30%), Splicing (10%), Nonsense (10%)

Nonsense (100%)

Inheritance Pattern

Primarily homozygous (90%); one compound heterozygous case (ADAD2)

X-linked recessive

Functional Impact

Disrupted meiotic synapsis (C14orf39, MSH5, ZSWIM7), impaired protein interactions (SPATA22-MEIOB, DND1), meiotic arrest (HFM1, KCTD19, ADAD2), RNA metabolism defects (YTHDC2)

Truncated ADGRG2 protein (loss of transmembrane domain)

Population Frequency

ADAD2 variants in 3 unrelated families; others in single families

Single family reported

Clinical Diagnosis

Testicular failure (high FSH, small testes)

Normal FSH, palpable vas deferens, post-testicular obstruction

Histological Findings

Sertoli cell-only, maturation arrest, hypospermatogenesis

Normal spermatogenesis with ductal obstruction

Treatment Implications

MicroTESE for sperm retrieval (30-50% success)

Surgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval (higher success)

5.2.3. Genetic and Clinical Characterization of Sperm Defects in Pakistani Families
Overall, 21 disease-causing variants across 19 genes were identified in Pakistani families from 2017 to 2025 with sperm count and motility defects. The DNAH gene family, critical for axonemal integrity, showed the highest mutational frequency (28.7%). DNAH17 variants included homozygous missense (p.Ala2103Val) and nonsense (p.Gln3935*) mutations, causing severe axonemal disorganization with over 78% abnormal sperm cross-sections. DNAH1 mutations featured a frameshift (p.N2549Qfs*61) and missense variant (p.C1789Y), disrupting fibrous sheath structure, while DNAH2 (p.W4240C) led to asthenozoospermia with 80-90% abnormal sperm. DNAH8 (p.6158_6159insT) and DNAH10 (compound heterozygous p.P3137T/p.D4316H and p.G2950D/p.R3687W) were associated with MMAF phenotypes and microtubule defects.
The CFAP gene family (16.7%), essential for flagellar assembly, included CFAP43 variants (p.Arg300Lysfs22, p.Thr526Serfs43) causing axonemal disassembly in 82% of sperm cross-sections, CFAP61 mutations (p.I151Nfs*4, p.R283*) leading to absent central pairs, and CFAP57 loss-of-function variants (p.R958, p.R913) contributing to MMAF. SPAG17 mutations (p.Asp212_Glu276del, p.Leu707) resulted in incomplete C1a projections and missing microtubule doublets. ARMC variants collectively contributed 16.7% of cases; ARMC2 (p.S61X) and ARMC3 (p.Glu245_Asp305delfs16) variants disrupted central pair complexes and mitochondrial sheath organization, respectively.
Additional genes implicated in diverse sperm defects (38.8% frequency) included NPHP4 (p.P497R), associated with a 9+0 microtubule configuration; TTC12 (p.Arg357Trp), causing flagellar ultrastructural defects; and CCDC34 (p.A283E), linked to outer dynein arm absence. AK7 splicing variants (c.871-4ACA>A) led to disorganized axonemes and abnormal mitochondrial sheets, while ADCY10 mutations (p.Arg968*, splicing c.4286+1G>T, c.436+2T>G) misassembled mitochondrial sheaths. TBC1D25 (p.Glu50Ala) impaired autophagy-related processes, STK33 (p.T412Kfs*14) caused complete flagellar disorganization, and ACTL7A (p.E50Afs*6) showed a founder effect in Pashtun descendants with acrosomal detachment. Notably, a novel homozygous variant in ENO4 [c.293A>G, p.(Lys98Arg)] was identified in two consanguineous brothers with severe sperm head defects, including globular, pyriform, and elongated morphologies with reduced head size, despite normal karyotypes (46 XY) and absent Y-chromosome microdeletions.
Reported genes in the Pakistani population exhibit distinct mutational patterns and phenotypic consequences. Frameshift mutations predominated (38.9%), followed by missense (33.3%), nonsense (16.7%), and splicing mutations (11.1%). Consanguinity profoundly influenced inheritance patterns, with 72.2% of variants occurring in homozygous state, while compound heterozygous variants accounted for 22.2%. A single X-linked recessive variant (5.6%) was identified in TBC1D25 (p.Glu50Ala). Functional categorization showed 44.4% of variants caused axonemal disassembly, 27.8% led to central pair complex defects, 16.7% resulted in fibrous sheath abnormalities, and 11.1% affected mitochondrial organization. Different pathogenic variants associated with male infertility are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. Different Pathogenic Variants Associated with Sperm Motility and Defects.

Gene

Variant

Mutation Type

Zygosity

Phenotypic Impact

Structural Defects

Frequency

DNAH17

c.6308C>T (p.Ala2103Val)

c.11803C>T (p.Gln3935*)

c.G5408A (p.C1803Y)

Missense

Nonsense

Missense

Homozygous

Homozygous

Homozygous

Severe axonemal disorganization

≥78% abnormal cross-sections, disrupted 9+2 array

14.3%

DNAH1

c.7646_7647insC (p.N2549Qfs*61)

c.6212T>G (p.C1789Y)

Frameshift

Missense

Homozygous

Homozygous

Fibrous sheath defects

Missing central singlets, disorganized FS

9.5%

DNAH2

c.12720G>T (p.W4240C)

Missense

Homozygous

Asthenozoospermia

80-90% abnormal sperm morphology

4.8%

DNAH8

c.6158_6159insT

Frameshift

Homozygous

MMAF

Divergent flagellar ultrastructure

4.8%

DNAH10

c.9409C>A (p.P3137T)

c.12946G>C (p.D4316H)

c.8849G>A (p.G2950D)

c.11509C>T (p.R3687W)

Missense

Missense

Missense

Missense

Compound Heterozygous

MMAF

Microtubule defects, head abnormalities

4.8%

CFAP43

c.900_901del (p.Arg300Lysfs*22)

c.1576_1577del (p.Thr526Serfs*43)

Frameshift

Frameshift

Compound Heterozygous

Homozygous

MMAF

82% abnormal cross-sections, absent CPC

9.5%

CFAP61

c.451_452del (p.I151Nfs*4)

c.847C>T (p.R283*)

Frameshift

Nonsense

Homozygous

Homozygous

MMAF

Missing central pairs, absent RS/IDA

4.8%

CFAP57

c.2872C>T (p.R958*)

c.2737C>T (p.R913*)

Nonsense

Nonsense

Homozygous

Homozygous

MMAF

Flagellar assembly defects

4.8%

SPAG17

c.829+1G>T (p.Asp212_Glu276del)

c.2120del (p.Leu707*)

Splicing

Frameshift

Homozygous

Homozygous

CPC defects

Complete CPC absence

4.8%

ARMC2

c.182C>G (p.S61X)

Nonsense

Homozygous

Mitochondrial defects

Vacuolated mitochondria, disrupted flagella

9.5%

ARMC3

c.916+1G>A (p.Glu245_Asp305delfs*16)

Splicing

Homozygous

MMAF

Incomplete C1a, missing doublets 1/9

9.5%

NPHP4

c.1490C>G (p.P497R)

Missense

Homozygous

9+0 configuration

Absent central microtubules

4.8%

TTC12

c.1069C>T (p.Arg357Trp)

Missense

Homozygous

Flagellar defects

Ultrastructural abnormalities

4.8%

CCDC34

c.848C>A (p.A283E)

Missense

Homozygous

OAT

Missing outer dynein arms

4.8%

AK7

c.871-4ACA>A

Splicing

Homozygous

MMAF

Disorganized axonemes, abnormal mitochondria

4.8%

ADCY10

c.2902C>T (p.Arg968*)

c.4286+1G>T

c.436+2T>G

Nonsense

Splicing

Splicing

Compound Heterozygous

Homozygous

Midpiece defects

Misarranged mitochondrial sheaths

4.8%

TBC1D25

c.197A>C (p.Glu50Ala)

Missense

X-linked

Oligozoospermia

Autophagy impairment

4.8%

STK33

c.1235del (p.T412Kfs*14)

Frameshift

Homozygous

MMAF

Complete flagellar disorganization

4.8%

ACTL7A

c.149_150del (p.E50Afs*6)

Frameshift

Homozygous

Acrosomal defects

98.9% acrosomal detachment (founder variant)

4.8%

ENO4

c.293A>G (p.Lys98Arg)

Missense

Homozygous

Sperm head defects

Globular/pyriform heads, reduced size

4.8%

5.3. Association of MTHFR Polymorphisms with Male Infertility
The association of MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T: rs1801133 and A1298C: rs1801131) with male infertility was investigated in Pakistani populations across two studies. In the first study (346 participants: 232 infertile, 114 fertile), the C677T variant showed distinct genotypic distributions: 72.8% of infertile men were homozygous (CC), 22.8% heterozygous (CT), and 4.3% homozygous for the risk allele (TT), compared to 86.8% (CC), 10.5% (CT), and 2.6% (TT) in controls. While the homozygous minor (TT) genotype did not differ significantly, the C allele frequency was significantly higher in controls (χ² = 8.22; OR = 2.17; p = 0.004). For A1298C, infertile men exhibited a higher frequency of the homozygous risk genotype (CC: 19.0% vs. 2.8% in controls), with statistically significant genotypic (χ² = 16.47; OR = 8.28; p < 0.0001) and allelic differences (χ² = 18.24; OR = 2.09; p < 0.0001).
A second study (437 infertile men: 57 azoospermic, 66 oligospermic, 44 asthenozoospermic, 29 teratozoospermic, 20 oligoasthenoteratospermic [OAT], 221 normospermic infertile; 218 fertile controls) confirmed the MTHFR C677T association. The minor 677T allele significantly increased infertility risk (p < 0.05), with CT (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.17-2.80; p = 0.008) and TT (OR: 9.24, 95% CI: 1.20-70.92; p = 0.032) genotypes showing elevated risk. All infertility subgroups had higher CT/TT frequencies versus controls (p < 0.05), and combined CT + TT genotypes were significantly associated with infertility (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.31–3.08; p < 0.001).
5.4. Molecular and Endocrine Markers of Male Infertility in the Pakistani Population
Recent studies on male infertility in Pakistani populations have revealed several key molecular and endocrine markers that distinguish fertile from infertile men. Research has demonstrated significant oxidative stress imbalances, with infertile men showing markedly reduced catalase (CAT) enzyme activity (0.20±0.01 U/mg) compared to fertile controls (0.33±0.03 U/mg). This oxidative imbalance was particularly pronounced in men with the CAT rs7943316 TT genotype, which appeared in 70.9% of infertile cases versus only 14% of controls. Concurrently, elevated levels of superoxide dismutase and reduced glutathione (GSH) were observed across all infertility subtypes, suggesting a compensatory response to oxidative damage .
Further investigations into neuroendocrine factors identified elevated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in infertile men, along with a significant association of the ACHE rs17228602 variant with infertility risk . These findings were accompanied by increased levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β, indicating an inflammatory component in male reproductive dysfunction. Endocrine profiling of azoospermic patients revealed distinct patterns, with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases showing elevated follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels, but significantly reduced kisspeptin compared to obstructive cases .
At the mitochondrial level, studies demonstrated downregulation of sirtuin genes (SIRT3, SIRT4, SIRT5) in infertile men, along with an abnormal inverse relationship with HSP90 expression . Genetic analyses identified androgen receptor CAG repeat length as another important factor, with longer repeats significantly associated with spermatogenic defects . These findings collectively paint a picture of male infertility as a multifactorial condition involving oxidative stress, endocrine dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and genetic predisposition, providing valuable insights for both diagnosis and potential therapeutic interventions in the Pakistani population.
6. Discussion
This systematic review presents a comprehensive analysis of genetic causes of male infertility in the Pakistani population diagnosed through whole exome sequencing (WES). The high rate of consanguinity (65%) in Pakistan has significantly influenced the genetic architecture of male infertility, with 72.2% of identified variants occurring in homozygous states. This finding aligns with the country's tradition of endogamous marriages and highlights the advantage of using WES combined with homozygosity mapping in consanguineous populations.
Our analysis revealed that 70.8% of the variants associated with male infertility in Pakistan were novel, underscoring the unique genetic landscape of this population. The remaining 29.2% of variants had been previously reported in other populations, demonstrating both shared and population-specific genetic contributions to infertility. Among the most frequently mutated genes were ADAD2 (identified in 30% of NOA cases) and HFM1 (20%), followed by C14orf39/SIX6OS1 (10%). The DNAH gene family emerged as particularly significant, accounting for 28.7% of sperm motility defects, with DNAH17 variants being the most prevalent.
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was the most common phenotype (66.7% of azoospermia cases), primarily caused by mutations in meiotic genes such as SPATA22, MEIOB, and MSH5. In contrast, obstructive azoospermia (OA) was less frequent and predominantly linked to the X-linked ADGRG2 gene. The predominance of NOA reflects the severe impact of consanguinity on spermatogenic failure, as most causative variants were autosomal recessive.
Frameshift mutations (38.9%) and missense variants (33.3%) were the most common mutation types, followed by nonsense (16.7%) and splicing mutations (11.1%). These genetic defects primarily disrupted critical biological processes including meiotic synapsis (C14orf39/SIX6OS1, MSH5, ZSWIM7), axonemal assembly (DNAH family, CFAP genes), and mitochondrial organization (ARMC2, ARMC3). The high frequency of DNAH and CFAP family mutations (45.4% combined) in sperm motility defects suggests these genes should be prioritized in genetic screening panels for Pakistani men with asthenozoospermia.
Our findings demonstrate that male infertility in Pakistan has distinct genetic patterns compared to other populations. The high prevalence of novel variants and the predominance of autosomal recessive inheritance reflect the effects of consanguinity.
Abbreviations

AChE

Acetylcholinesterase

AZF

Azoospermia Factor (regions a, b, c)

CAT

Catalase

CFAP

Cilia and Flagella Associated Protein

CI

Confidence Interval

CPC

Central Pair Complex

FS

Fibrous Sheath

FSH

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

GTG-banding

G-banding using Trypsin and Giemsa

GSH

Glutathione

HSP90

Heat Shock Protein 90

IL-1β

Interleukin-1 beta

LH

Luteinizing Hormone

MMAF

Multiple Morphological Abnormalities of the Flagella

MTHFR

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase

NOA

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Author Contributions
Musavir Abbas: Writing Original Draft
Nisar Ahmad: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft
Ahmad Faraz: Formal Analysis
Manahil Younas: Formal Analysis
Zain-Ul-Abideen: Formal Analysis
Wasim Shah: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Data and Code Accessibility
The authors confirm that all the data are already presented in the article.
Approval for Publication
After reviewing the manuscript, the authors have decided to submit it to the publication. The authors declare that nothing in the study has ever been published before or is presently being considered for publication anywhere.
Ethics and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Khayat, A. M., et al., Consanguineous marriage and its association with genetic disorders in Saudi Arabia: a review. Cureus, 2024. 16(2).
[2] Chisholm, J. S. and A. H. Bittles, Consanguinity and the developmental origins of health and disease. J Evol Med, 2015. 3: p. 1-4.
[3] Riaz, H. F., S. Mannan, and S. Malik, Consanguinity and its socio-biological parameters in Rahim yar Khan district, Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2016. 35: p. 1-11.
[4] Bittles, A. H. and M. L. Black, Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010. 107(suppl_1): p. 1779-1786.
[5] Oniya, O., et al., A review of the reproductive consequences of consanguinity. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2019. 232: p. 87-96.
[6] Anwar, W. A., M. Khyatti, and K. Hemminki, Consanguinity and genetic diseases in North Africa and immigrants to Europe. The European Journal of Public Health, 2014. 24(suppl_1): p. 57-63.
[7] Bener, A. and R. R. Mohammad, Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, 2017. 18(4): p. 315-320.
[8] Demirtas, A., E. C. Akinsal, and O. Ekmekcioglu, Parental consanguinity in infertile males. 2013.
[9] Heidari, F., et al., Prevalence and risk factors of consanguineous marriage. European Journal of General Medicine, 2014. 11(4): p. 248-255.
[10] Lawrenz, B., et al., Ethnical and sociocultural differences causing infertility are poorly understood-insights from the Arabian perspective. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. 36(4): p. 661-665.
[11] Inhorn, M. C., Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Medical anthropology quarterly, 2004. 18(2): p. 162-182.
[12] Minhas, S., et al., European association of urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2021 update on male infertility. European urology, 2021. 80(5): p. 603-620.
[13] Ferlin, A., et al., Association of partial AZFc region deletions with spermatogenic impairment and male infertility. Journal of medical genetics, 2005. 42(3): p. 209-213.
[14] Carrell, D., C. De Jonge, and D. Lamb, The genetics of male infertility: a field of study whose time is now. Archives of andrology, 2006. 52(4): p. 269-274.
[15] Krausz, C., Editorial for the special issue on the molecular genetics of male infertility. Human Genetics, 2021. 140(1): p. 1-5.
[16] Nieschlag, E., et al., Male reproductive health and dysfunction. Male reproductive health and dysfunction, 2010.
[17] Waclawska, A. and M. Kurpisz, Key functional genes of spermatogenesis identified by microarray analysis. Systems biology in reproductive medicine, 2012. 58(5): p. 229-235.
[18] Verstovsek, S., et al., Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010. 363(12): p. 1117-1127.
[19] Mahmood, A., Y Chromosome Microdeletions in Pakistani Infertile Men. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College, 2017. 6(1): p. 14-21.
[20] Naz, F., et al., Cytogenetic abnormalities associated with reproductive failure in Pakistani population: Experience of a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 2024. 74(3): p. 555-555.
[21] Cooper, T. G., et al., World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human reproduction update, 2010. 16(3): p. 231-245.
[22] Esteves, S. C., R. Miyaoka, and A. Agarwal, An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. Clinics, 2011. 66(4): p. 691-700.
[23] Aziz, N., The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia. Clinics, 2013. 68: p. 35-38.
[24] Esteves, S. C. and A. Agarwai, The azoospermic male: current knowledge and future perspectives. Clinics, 2013. 68: p. 01-04.
[25] Wu, Y., et al., Whole-exome sequencing of consanguineous families with infertile men and women identifies homologous mutations in SPATA22 and MEIOB. Human Reproduction, 2021. 36(10): p. 2793-2804.
[26] Fan, S., et al., Homozygous mutations in C14orf39/SIX6OS1 cause non-obstructive azoospermia and premature ovarian insufficiency in humans. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2021. 108(2): p. 324-336.
[27] Gong, C., et al., A homozygous loss-of-function mutation in MSH5 abolishes MutSγ axial loading and causes meiotic arrest in NOA-affected individuals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022. 23(12): p. 6522.
[28] Xie, X., et al., Biallelic HFM1 variants cause non-obstructive azoospermia with meiotic arrest in humans by impairing crossover formation to varying degrees. Human Reproduction, 2022. 37(7): p. 1664-1677.
[29] Xie, X., et al., A homozygous missense variant in DND1 causes non-obstructive azoospermia in humans. Frontiers in Genetics, 2022. 13: p. 1017302.
[30] Zhang, H. and Q. Zhang, Loss-of-function variants in KCTD19 cause non-obstructive azoospermia in humans.
[31] Shi, B., et al., Biallelic mutations in RNA-binding protein ADAD2 cause spermiogenic failure and non-obstructive azoospermia in humans. Human Reproduction Open, 2023. 2023(3): p. hoad022.
[32] Hussain, S., et al., A novel homozygous variant in homologous recombination repair gene ZSWIM7 causes azoospermia in males and primary ovarian insufficiency in females. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 2022. 65(11): p. 104629.
[33] Tian, S., et al., A homozygous missense variant in YTHDC2 induces azoospermia in two siblings. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2024. 299(1): p. 84.
[34] Khan, M. J., et al., X-linked ADGRG2 mutation and obstructive azoospermia in a large Pakistani family. Scientific Reports, 2018. 8(1): p. 16280.
[35] Zhang, B., et al., Novel loss‐of‐function variants in DNAH17 cause multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella in humans and mice. Clinical Genetics, 2021. 99(1): p. 176-186.
[36] Khan, R., et al., Novel loss-of-function mutations in DNAH1 displayed different phenotypic spectrum in humans and mice. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2021. 12: p. 765639.
[37] Hwang, J. Y., et al., Genetic defects in DNAH2 underlie male infertility with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella in humans and mice. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2021. 9: p. 662903.
[38] Dil, S., et al., A novel homozygous frameshift variant in DNAH8 causes multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella in a consanguineous Pakistani family. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2023. 25(3): p. 350-355.
[39] Shoaib, M., et al., Novel bi-allelic variants in DNAH10 lead to multiple morphological abnormalities of sperm flagella and male infertility. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2025: p. 10.4103.
[40] Khan, I., et al., Novel biallelic loss-of-function mutations in CFAP43 cause multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagellum in Pakistani families. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2021. 23(6): p. 627-632.
[41] Ma, A., et al., Biallelic variants in CFAP61 cause multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella and male infertility. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2022. 9: p. 803818.
[42] Ma, A., et al., Loss-of-function mutations in CFAP57 cause multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella in humans and mice. JCI insight, 2023. 8(3): p. e166869.
[43] Liu, T., et al., Novel homozygous SPAG17 variants cause human male infertility through multiple morphological abnormalities of spermatozoal flagella related to axonemal microtubule doublets. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2025. 27(2): p. 245-253.
[44] Khan, I., et al., A novel stop-gain mutation in ARMC2 is associated with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2021. 43(5): p. 913-919.
[45] Rahim, F., et al., A homozygous ARMC3 splicing variant causes asthenozoospermia and flagellar disorganization in a consanguineous family. Clinical Genetics, 2024. 106(4): p. 437-447.
[46] Ali, A., et al., A novel NPHP4 homozygous missense variant identified in infertile brothers with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2024. 41(1): p. 109-120.
[47] Ali, I., et al., A novel homozygous missense TTC12 variant identified in an infertile Pakistani man with severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and primary ciliary dyskinesia. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2024. 299(1): p. 69.
[48] Ahmad, N., et al., A novel missense mutation of CCDC34 causes male infertility with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia in a consanguineous Pakistani family. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2024. 26(6): p. 605-609.
[49] Hussain, A., et al., A novel homozygous splicing mutation in AK7 causes multiple morphological abnormalities of sperm flagella in patients from consanguineous Pakistani families. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2025. 27(2): p. 189-195.
[50] Zeb, A., et al., Novel biallelic ADCY10 variants cause asthenozoospermia with excessive residual cytoplasm and hydronephrosis in humans. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2025. 50(3): p. 104481.
[51] Nawaz, S., et al., First evidence of involvement of TBC1D25 in causing human male infertility. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 2021. 64(2): p. 104142.
[52] Ma, H., et al., Novel frameshift mutation in STK33 is associated with asthenozoospermia and multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella. Human Molecular Genetics, 2021. 30(21): p. 1977-1984.
[53] Zhou, J., et al., A recessive ACTL7A founder variant leads to male infertility due to acrosome detachment in Pakistani Pashtuns. Clinical Genetics, 2023. 104(5): p. 564-570.
[54] Nawaz, S., et al., A variant in sperm‐specific glycolytic enzyme enolase 4 (ENO4) causes human male infertility. The Journal of Gene Medicine, 2024. 26(1): p. e3583.
[55] Ullah, N., et al., MTHFR polymorphisms as risk for male infertility in Pakistan and its comparison with socioeconomic status in the world. Personalized Medicine, 2019. 16(1): p. 35-49.
[56] Irfan, M., et al., Association of the MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) polymorphism with idiopathic male infertility in a local Pakistani population. Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics: BJMG, 2016. 19(1): p. 51.
[57] Soda, M., et al., Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature, 2007. 448(7153): p. 561-566.
[58] Sadia, K., et al., Antioxidant enzymes and association of CAT SNP‐21 A/T (rs7943316) with male infertility. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2021. 88(9): p. 598-604.
[59] Sadia, K., et al., Acetylcholinesterase, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and association of ACHE SNP rs 17228602 with male infertility. PloS one, 2023. 18(4): p. e0282579.
[60] Amjad, S., et al., Correlation of serum kisspeptin and leptin with non-obstructive azoospermia: A cross-sectional study in a subset of Karachi population. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2024. 40(3Part-II): p. 410.
[61] Bello, J. H., et al., Dysregulation of mitochondrial sirtuin genes is associated with human male infertility. Andrologia, 2022. 54(1): p. e14274.
[62] Ashraf, M., et al., Association of trinucleotide repeat polymorphisms CAG and GGC in exon 1 of the Androgen Receptor gene with male infertility: a cross-sectional study. Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. 52(6): p. 1793-1801.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abbas, M., Ahmad, N., Faraz, A., Younas, M., Zain-Ul-Abideen, et al. (2025). A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 13(4), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abbas, M.; Ahmad, N.; Faraz, A.; Younas, M.; Zain-Ul-Abideen, et al. A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2025, 13(4), 73-82. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abbas M, Ahmad N, Faraz A, Younas M, Zain-Ul-Abideen, et al. A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025. Int J Genet Genomics. 2025;13(4):73-82. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11,
      author = {Musavir Abbas and Nisar Ahmad and Ahmad Faraz and Manahil Younas and Zain-Ul-Abideen and Wasim Shah},
      title = {A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics},
      volume = {13},
      number = {4},
      pages = {73-82},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20251304.11},
      abstract = {Male infertility in Pakistan exhibits unique genetic patterns due to high consanguinity rates (65%). This systematic review of 38 studies (2015-2025) analyzed 2,041 participants (1,503 infertile men, 538 controls) using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Key findings reveal distinct genetic causes and inheritance patterns specific to this population. Chromosomal abnormalities affected 20.9% of azoospermic men, primarily Klinefelter syndrome (14.7%). Y-chromosome microdeletions occurred in 8% of cases, mostly in the AZFc region (50%). We identified 72 pathogenic variants across 58 genes, with 70.8% being novel to Pakistani populations. Consanguinity drove homozygous inheritance in 72.2% of cases. The most frequently mutated genes included ADAD2 (30% of non-obstructive azoospermia), HFM1 (20%), and DNAH family members (28.7% of motility defects). Variant types comprised frameshift (38.9%), missense (33.3%), nonsense (16.7%), and splicing mutations (11.1%). Significant biochemical markers included the CAT rs7943316 TT genotype (70.9% vs 14% controls) and elevated oxidative stress markers. These findings establish the first comprehensive genetic profile of Pakistani male infertility, demonstrating the profound impact of consanguinity on disease expression. The results emphasize the need for population-specific diagnostic protocols that prioritize DNAH/CFAP genes for motility disorders and ADAD2 for non-obstructive azoospermia. This review provides critical insights for genetic counseling and clinical management in high-consanguinity populations.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Systematic Review of Genetic Causes of Male Infertility Diagnosed by Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Pakistani Population: Updates from 2015 to June 2025
    
    AU  - Musavir Abbas
    AU  - Nisar Ahmad
    AU  - Ahmad Faraz
    AU  - Manahil Younas
    AU  - Zain-Ul-Abideen
    AU  - Wasim Shah
    Y1  - 2025/10/10
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11
    T2  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JF  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JO  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    SP  - 73
    EP  - 82
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7359
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20251304.11
    AB  - Male infertility in Pakistan exhibits unique genetic patterns due to high consanguinity rates (65%). This systematic review of 38 studies (2015-2025) analyzed 2,041 participants (1,503 infertile men, 538 controls) using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Key findings reveal distinct genetic causes and inheritance patterns specific to this population. Chromosomal abnormalities affected 20.9% of azoospermic men, primarily Klinefelter syndrome (14.7%). Y-chromosome microdeletions occurred in 8% of cases, mostly in the AZFc region (50%). We identified 72 pathogenic variants across 58 genes, with 70.8% being novel to Pakistani populations. Consanguinity drove homozygous inheritance in 72.2% of cases. The most frequently mutated genes included ADAD2 (30% of non-obstructive azoospermia), HFM1 (20%), and DNAH family members (28.7% of motility defects). Variant types comprised frameshift (38.9%), missense (33.3%), nonsense (16.7%), and splicing mutations (11.1%). Significant biochemical markers included the CAT rs7943316 TT genotype (70.9% vs 14% controls) and elevated oxidative stress markers. These findings establish the first comprehensive genetic profile of Pakistani male infertility, demonstrating the profound impact of consanguinity on disease expression. The results emphasize the need for population-specific diagnostic protocols that prioritize DNAH/CFAP genes for motility disorders and ADAD2 for non-obstructive azoospermia. This review provides critical insights for genetic counseling and clinical management in high-consanguinity populations.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information